Developers are still banned from advertising within an app that there are cheaper alternative payment options elsewhere. ![]() But it's far from a momentous change or concession. The email clause is the key addition - here's the existing rule to compare - and it means developers might have an easier time contacting users if they know they won't be penalized for using email.The company is not meaningfully changing those rules in any way as part of the settlement, but instead simply "clarifying," as it wrote in its press release, "that developers can use communications, such as email, to share information about payment methods outside of their iOS app." This is critical for understanding the bounds of Apple's anti-steering restrictions. ![]() Yet Apple made clear the contact info had to be obtained with explicit user consent for the purpose of that communication and not, say, for the purpose of creating a new account within the app. The company's new App Store guidelines, released in June during its WWDC event, outlined that developers were in fact allowed to contact users about alternative payment options (something some developers were already doing). The wording in Apple's press release and the reality of its existing policies don't translate into any meaningful new changes for iOS app makers, and therein lies the problem.Īpple has agreed to something it already allows. It also included a few minor commitments and a $100 million payout to small developers, of which $30 million would go to the lawyers involved if approved.Įxcept it wasn't much of a concession at all. The class-action settlement was widely reported as a "concession" from Apple to please developers by allowing them to email users about alternative payment options that bypass its 30% App Store commission. Note the $500M is roughly half in penalties and half in reimbursement to affected customers.Apple's developer settlement Thursday night significantly muddied the waters of the ongoing App Store antitrust fight, and it just might threaten the eventual outcome of Epic Games' Fortnite case. While not the largest penalty (that was Facebook at $5 Billion in 2019), this should raise eyebrows around the C Suite to show the importance of privacy and cost of violations.Fines in the half a billion dollars range are good examples to get management’s backing to make changes needed to protect customer data!. ![]() ![]() The US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has fined Fortnite maker Epic Games more than half a billion dollars over allegations that it violated the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) and used dark patterns to trick users into making unwanted purchases. Read more: Fortnite Video Game Maker Epic Games to Pay More Than Half a Billion Dollars over FTC Allegations of Privacy Violations and Unwanted Charges Overview: FTC Fines Fortnite Maker $500M Over Privacy Violations and Unauthorized Charges As per FTC, Epic violated children’s privacy protections and used deceptive interfaces to trick players into making unintentional purchases. Read more: Fortnite Video Game Maker Epic Games to Pay More Than Half a Billion Dollars over FTC Allegations of Privacy Violations and Unwanted Charges Updated on Įpic Games, the developer of the Fortnite video game, has agreed to pay $520 million for privacy violations. The US FTC has settled with Epic Games, and the gaming company has agreed to pay a $520 million fine in two lawsuits that accused the company of (1) breaching COPPA and collecting data on small children, (2) and employing dark patterns to trick customers into making unintentional purchases.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |